calcio

in general, the goals always get in when i'm not looking. i'm not only talking about the world cup. why why why? they like to wait til i have to go to the wc, or get a sip of drink, or type a blog entry. heh... ok, actually maybe because i like to multi-task.

brazil just won australia. yayy.. aussies played well, but no luck. i believe in luck. isn't it luck that brings you good weather? isn't it luck that make you land on a twisted ankle and hence get a sprain? (you don't practice falling right? well perhaps the soccer players shld then...)

anyway czech lost to ghana. ghana was freaking fast. and italians.. drawed by themselves. if it's the finals, that guy is gonna get shot by the mafias when he goes back.


as i write, i wonder if i shld comment too much. have you read sunday times today? the article about women should not talk about soccer because they really don't know shit about it. i wonder. i agree on some points the writer said, if you haven't played the game, you won't know about it. but i guess if you play team sports competitively, you should be able to read the game play quite well. furthermore with interest, and soccernet, it's really quite easy to get on with the game (not just world cup). anyway, i doubt the writer understands woman enough actually. how can he use michael owen and owen wilson as examples of whom women think are cute! convenient enough just because they have owens in their names? blehz. we know enough to know who are torres, and c.ronaldo. and owen wilson is a freaking comedian. c'mon, he's not known for his looks. he can't even be zoolander!

i quote him:"there's nothing more irritating than having to engage a woman on a footbal topic when it's obvious she doesn't know her stuff - but thinks she does."

if that's the case, there's nothing more irritating than having to engage a man on a who's-cute topic when it's obvious he doesn't know his stuff - but thinks he does.

please don't stereotype! it's very rude!